| Home | Book | About |
The Missing Key to Truth
We discussed the Bible's origin in our previous posts. Now, we will focus on these Bible Sources and identify the “missing” key that a false doctrine will ignore that blinds innocent Christians from seeing the Truth.
If we have read the previous post, we now know about the Oral Torah (a.k.a. the Oral Bible). It provides a detailed explanation on a case-by-case basis of the Written Torah, also known as the Old Testament for Christians. I think it is not right to call it “old” because it reflects the reality on the ground, encompassing both the past, present, and future, so it should be called by its rightful name, the Written Torah.
I grew up as a Catholic, so I know that Oral Torah (Oral Bible) is bypassed and has no idea that such exists, for they drive the parishioners to focus on the New Testament. They train the innocent Catholics to think that the New Testament fulfills the Written Torah (Old Testament), but it is straightforwardly wrong. We have to remember the order:
- Moses got the Oral teachings directly from GOD (Oral Torah). Over those 40 years in the wilderness/desert, Moses taught the Israelites orally the case-to-case basis of the commandments he learned directly from GOD in Mt. Sinai.
- Later, Moses and the scribes summarized the lecture as Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, which is called Torah (i.e., the Written Torah - a summarized version of the Oral Torah)
- Over the history of the Israelites, GOD has given prophecies orally (i.e., the prophets did not receive any emails, documents, laptops, iPads, cellphones, or even the scrolls, which were available in their time). GOD communicated orally and some through dreams. They received the “Full” prophecy from GOD containing the case-to-case scenarios (i.e., still an Oral Torah, even before it was formally written by the prophets or scribes). It later became part of the Torah, now known as Tanakh. Technically, Tanakh is what the Roman Catholic doctrine unjustly renamed as an “Old Testament.”
We should not decouple the Oral Torah (Oral Bible) from the Written Torah (Old Testament) because the Oral Torah elaborates on the Written Torah, for the Written Torah is a summarized version. There’s danger in this decoupling, as elaborated in Mosquito Analogy from the previous post. Below is another analogy to prove the point:
Superhero Analogy
A professor talks with the Dean, and after their discussion, the professor went to his classroom to teach. The topic he discussed orally is about the hero and the basic requirements is that this hero must be alive to fulfill the mission so that he will be rightful to have the title Superhero. The professor then created a summarized version of what he lectured orally into a document format and compressed it into a zip format. The oral lecture is the uncompressed version, while the zip format is the compressed version. The oral lecture and the zip file are coupled together, for these two reflect one story. One of the students did not pay attention and ignored the lecture by the professor (i.e., given orally). The professor attached the zip file he created for this lecture and emailed it to the students. He instructed the students to provide their understanding and comments about it as their assignment.
The professor came home late at night, and when he arrived, he asked his son if he had finished the assignment. Then the son answered yes. The father then saw that the zip file he sent to all students was not uncompressed on his son's computer. The father asked again, and the son gave the completed summary to his father. The student who did not listen to his oral lecture was his son.
The professor was shocked that his son did not use the uncompressed version of his lecture but just took the zip file as a reference. The zip format filename is "The superhero who saves," and the summary of his son's assignment states that the superhero is a supernatural being who came down to earth and died saving humanity. The superhero will come back again to claim glory. The professor told his son that his assignment was not correct and he must review it.
The next day, his son went to his friend's classroom, told about his interpretation, and referred to it as a formulation of a superhero and was convinced. That classroom was the next classroom where the professor would teach about the superhero. No one in that class bothered to listen to the professor and thought that the narrative of his son was the golden standard. Investigating the unusual behavior of this class, the professor found out that his son taught the false narrative. The Dean called his son and the professor and explained to the son that it was him, (i.e., the Dean) the superhero is his life story as a war veteran who saves lives and not a supernatural being who came down to earth. For the Dean to achieve such a medal of honor (as a superhero), one of the requirements is that he must be alive, not dead, and there's no such thing as a second coming to claim the medal, for that second coming is just a narrative of the professor's son. They did that lecture on their campus in preparation for Veterans Day, as the professor lectured orally what the Dean had explained.
The son complained that it was invalid because it was not in the zip file. The Dean replied that our oral discussion with the Professor existed before the zip file existed. The main point is that the zip file was created based on the Professor's oral lecture (originally orally given by the Dean). The claim "was not in the zip file" becomes valid when the condition is that the claim is not in the oral lecture (This is similar to what people say that it is not in the Bible, but we have to be very specific that it is not in the Oral Bible, i.e., the Oral Torah because it came first before the Written Torah (Old Testament) and Old Testament is only a summarized version of the Oral Torah. But the mind, eyes, and ears of his son were closed and created his interpretation and formulation of a superhero by claiming that his summary is the fulfillment of the zip file.
The negative impact of removing the Oral Lecture and decoupling it from the zip file is undeniable because anyone can create their own interpretation and formulation. We cannot decouple/separate Oral Lecture from the zip file, for they are one. The difference is that the Oral Lecture of the Professor provides a comprehensive, detailed explanation, while the zip file is complete but in a compressed format.
Similarly, we cannot decouple the Oral Torah from the Written Torah (i.e., the Old Testament in Christian language). Oral Torah should come together with Written Torah, for they are one. The Oral Torah is the uncompressed version, and the Written Torah is the zip format. An example is the commandment: “Thou shall not kill.“The Ten Commandments were firmly established at the time of King David, so why would he kill Goliath? The answer is that there is a need for a context and case-to-case basis, which the Written Torah (i.e., the Old Testament for Christians) does not elaborate but summarizes this commandment. The context and case-to-case basis are in the Oral Torah, and the Written Torah is still complete but in a summarized format.
Similar to our analogy, the Roman Catholic doctrine bypasses the Oral Torah and proclaims that the New Testament fulfills the Old Testament. Let me give you an example: Trinity is a formulated doctrine. Did you know that a True Christ (i.e., the Messiah) will not die in the context of fulfilling the complete mission (not partial) set by GOD in the Oral and Written Testament? If their alibi is the suffering servant, it is covered in Chapter 14.11 The Suffering Servant of the Save Our Souls free book and it refers to the Israelites (present day Israelis). Did you know that the True Christ will not be born from a virgin? You’ll be surprised by a lot of things you do not know. The Oral Torah prophecies are genuinely directly from GOD, not a formulation. Which one is more reliable, the formulated one or the one directly from GOD?
The claim is that the New Testament is the Will of GOD and Trinity is based on the scriptures. If that is true, then the Oral Torah, Written Torah, and New Testament should have synchronized and no conflicting prophecies. The problem now is the inconsistencies between the New Testament and the Oral/Written Torah. For example, the True Christ (Messiah) is alive (not dead, no second coming) in context of fulfilling the complete mission and not partial, so the title Christ (Messiah) is bestowed upon him (The True Christ anointing is for our future post). The narrative for the prophecies directly given by GOD to the prophets should have some indication that it might change in the future. It might state something like “Until further notice…,” “Subject for future changes…,” but the truth is that the prophecy of the True Christ(Messiah) is very consistent with the Oral and Written Torah, and the New Testament deviates from it yet without synchronizing with the Oral Torah claims to have fulfilled the Written Torah, much like in our analogy where the narrative of the son claims that it fulfills the zip file assignment, without referring to the uncompressed version (i.e., referring to the Oral Torah in our context). For details of these inconsistencies, see Chapter 2 Messiah Origin in the Save Our Souls free book, available for download and free distribution.
GOD can see the future. If the New Testament is what GOD sees for the future, then what should have been given to Moses and the Prophets is a dead Christ (Messiah) coming back for the second time to fulfill that role. The Truth is GOD can see the future, and what GOD gave to Moses and the Prophets is that True Christ (Messiah) is not a dead person but is alive in the context of fulfilling the Complete Mission set By GOD, so there’s no second coming because True Christ (Messiah) is alive in fulling those missions. Many do not know about it (and I feel sorry for them) and think that what’s in their doctrine is the Golden Standard when, in fact, their doctrine is a deviation from what GOD foresaw for the future True Christ as the Genuine Prophecy.
Now that you know that the True Christ does not die fulfilling the complete mission, we have two versions of Christ: The Genuine Christ and the Formulated Christ. I stand with the Genuine Christ who does not die because that is the Genuine/Authentic Prophecy directly from GOD. As I’ve mentioned, they will demonize the whistleblowers as they did to Galileo Galilei, falsely accusing him of Heresy. As a whistleblower, I also experienced what Galileo had experienced. They falsely accused me of Terrorism, Satanic, Anti-Christ. Now you know that these are all lies intended to character-assassinate me so people will turn away from me. If you see both sides inside and outside the box, what will happen when that worthy person sits for the title of Christ and has not died in accomplishing the complete mission, and those who do not want the True Christ because they have Christ in their box who died, and create a notion of second coming. What probably will happen is that they will act against it because they want their candidate on their box to sit on that title against the True Christ who did not die and had accomplished all the mission alive, who will then become the Anti-Christ?
The problem is that they train people to stick inside the box of their doctrine. They will claim that they have accepted that the world is round (not geostatic, not geocentric). But the mindset is the same as of the time of Galileo Galilei; they only accepted the information but still stuck their mind within the box of their doctrine and trained to demonize people who speak against their doctrine, i.e., in my experience. If they only go out of the box (i.e., that they are in), they will see that there’s truth Out there and that the earth is round. Similarly, I encourage everyone not to close their mind and go out of the box and see the truth. Do not stick your mind inside the box, but look both inside and outside the box.
The key is knowing what is “really” directly from GOD, not the formulated one. Of course, they will claim that the New Testament is from GOD and that the Trinity doctrine, was formulated based on the New and Old Testament. But that claim is within the bounds of their narrative and not synchronized with the Original Prophecy from both the Oral and Written Torah (i.e., the Oral and Old Testament in Christian language). Is it not that the flat world (i.e., geo-static and geo-centric) claim of their doctrine against Galileo was based on the New and Old Testament? I’m not your enemy, but risking my life trying to save you from the false doctrine. May GOD bless you for reading and absorbing the lessons from this post.