The Wrong Faith Paradigm

Under the Roman Catholic faith, worship, and praise, they would treat their god as the highest being. They would proclaim that no one is above their god, but does their doctrine align with what they claim on how they treat their god? Does their doctrine respect the Nature of GOD? Is their doctrine above the Nature of GOD? Can a doctrine decide when the Nature of GOD takes effect only when its formulation dictates to do so? Is putting the Nature of Man dominant above the Nature of GOD the solution to Salvation? Can GOD provide Salvation without any impurities of His Nature as GOD? Let us explore this topic within the context of the Omniscience of GOD.

I grew up Catholic, so I knew they treated Jesus as GOD and worshiped and praised Him above all. As a whistleblower, I can see that their doctrine and claims, specifically that they put God above all, do not align. GOD and His Nature are One, and the Nature of GOD is part of GOD. We do not tamper or formulate something concerning the Nature of GOD because only GOD decides His Nature (not the angels, humans, any doctrine, or any religion). That is why in the The Right Faith Paradigm, the Nature of GOD is above any Religion, as shown in Figure B. The Right Faith Paradigm below. Compare the paradigm below to Figure A. The Wrong Faith Paradigm above and think first if it is right to put Salvation above the Nature of GOD and the Nature of Man dominant over the Nature of GOD.

Let us now go into the details. We have discussed in GOD is Omniscient 2 that in their Narrative of Salvation depicted in Nativity of Jesus, Jesus is in a state of not being Omniscient, i.e., unable to talk, unable to walk, dependent on Mary or Joseph for Jesus, being a baby, have no power or capacity to decide. We know that True GOD is Omniscient, all the time, in all states, in all existence, and not sometimes. That is the problem because they want Jesus to become a GOD, so they formulated the Dual Nature in their doctrine, specifically, the Hypostatic Union formulation, to introduce the Nature of Man as part of GOD having two natures. In this way, they do not need to worry if people ask about Jesus’ incompatibilities with the Nature of GOD in his existence as a human being. From the perspective of the parishioners, they see this narrative as the way to Salvation that their god came down from heaven to earth, born as a human being to Sacrifice his life for the forgiveness of sins. The whole equation of their doctrine is Sacrifice and Salvation. The problem now is when you tell the parishioners that this is wrong because GOD is always Omniscient, and not sometimes or not when their doctrine dictates when their false GOD becomes Omniscient, they usually ignore the Nature of GOD that GOD is always Omniscient and tolerates that state where their false GOD, Jesus, is not Omniscient. The psychological behavior of many parishioners (not all) is to make the Nature of Man dominate the Nature of GOD, as depicted in The Wrong Faith Paradigm. We can see that many of them avoid putting the Nature of GOD on top and prefer to make the Nature of man dominate over the Nature of GOD. The psychology of this is for our future post: Avoidance Strategy 1.

As we can see in their doctrine, Salvation is at the top. Even their false GOD is only a Sacrificial Medium to attain Salvation. They would think that it is okay that their Jesus has a state of not being Omniscient, but a True GOD does not have a state of not being Omniscient; only a false GOD does have a state of not being Omniscient. Again, if their alibi is that Jesus is still a baby, he has to learn to speak and has to learn to walk. Still, that is under the Nature of Man to have that learning curve. Still, it falls to Not being Omniscient. We do not put any learning curve to GOD because GOD is Omniscient. Their logical reasoning bends to making the Nature of Man dominant over the Nature of GOD to push the notion that Man is GOD. If people with the right mind ask questions regarding the line between the Nature of Man and the Nature of GOD, then they would use the scapegoat "Unfathomable" as explained in Broken Unfathomable Doctrine 1 and Broken Unfathomable Doctrine 2. Let us now see the problem with their paradigm of tolerating the Nature of Man to dominate over the Nature of GOD in the name of Salvation that even their false GOD becomes a sacrificial medium to achieve it.

As we can see on the green line representing the record of a True GOD is a Perfect, Untainted, and Unblemished Record of Omniscience. What they aim to do is inject Jesus into their Trinity as one GOD in three persons and use "Unfathomable" as a scapegoat for questions that their doctrine cannot answer. It is invalid because many parishioners missed the impurity introduced by their formulation of the Perfect Nature of GOD. They know that GOD is always Omniscient, so they would use the Father in the Trinity to escape this validation, but the state of the Father, Who is always Omniscient, does make the state of the Son always Omniscient, as proven in the graph. The Son, in the person of Jesus, will always have that state where he is not Omniscient, regardless of the reason that Jesus was resurrected and has conquered sin for Salvation. That is where the mistake of many parishioners, i.e., not listening, closing their minds, and ignoring because they only think of the Narrative of the Roman Catholic doctrine for Salvation and not on the side of GOD, as I have repeatedly explained the lesson of the life story of Galileo Galileo that many people close their minds and do not know how to listen. In my experience as a whistleblower, very few know how to listen, and it is like finding a needle in a haystack.

The Impurity their doctrine introduced on the Omniscience of GOD will cause a ripple effect on the other Nature of GOD, as discussed in The Ripple Effect post. The Ripple Effect explains that if one of the Nature of GOD, such as Omniscience, is altered, tampered with, tainted, or blemished, it will cause a cascading, domino effect or chain reaction to the other Nature that ends up in someone who is not GOD like Jesus. Without a doubt, Impurity is not the way of GOD, and many parishioners neglect to think about this because what they have in mind is the two words Sacrifice and Salvation, without thinking of the Impurity and Corruption effect on the Nature of GOD. In short, their Faith is geared toward the side of the doctrine and its narrative instead of the side of GOD and His Nature. It is the opposite in their claim that they put GOD above all, where, in reality, their doctrines put Salvation above their false GOD. If they are really on the side of GOD, they put the Nature of GOD on top of the Nature of Man because GOD can find a way for Salvation where His Nature as GOD dominates over the Nature of Man without any impurities.

It is not right to put the Nature of Man dominant over the Nature of GOD as we have demonstrated that their doctrine allows the Nature of Man (not omniscient) to dominate over the Nature of GOD (always Omniscient). It is wrong because their doctrine presumes that GOD cannot find a way for Salvation where His Nature as GOD dominates over all creations. Do you “really” think that GOD cannot find a way for Salvation where Nature as GOD dominates above all? They use the notion of Sacrifice and Salvation to bribe people into their doctrine. Once they do that, they trap the people into the box of their doctrine, as explained in the The Box Effect post. The mind of their victims will prioritize the Nature of Man over the Nature of GOD because all they think is Sacrifice and Salvation on top and their false GOD at the bottom. Yes, they will argue that they put GOD above all. However, we can see that their false GOD is just a sacrificial medium for their Salvation, allowing the Nature of Man to dominate over the Nature of GOD because their alibi is Salvation.

Observe that if we argue that their false GOD does not know how to talk, they will respond that He is still a baby, so it’s allowable that he is not Omniscient. It is their doctrine that dictates when their false GOD becomes Omniscient. If we argue that their false GOD does not know how to talk, they will respond that Jesus is still a baby, so it’s allowable that he is not Omniscient. It is their doctrine that decides when their false GOD becomes Omniscient. It is wrong because no doctrine should decide when GOD should be Omniscient because GOD is Omniscient all the time and in all His existence, not sometimes, and not when their doctrine decides or dictates. Again, they cannot lie that Jesus is Omniscient and use the reason that Jesus did not show it yet because he is a baby, for using that alibi would make Jesus deceive Mary, Joseph, and all the people in their Nativity Narrative. Wisdom comes from GOD, and Wisdom is applied when we make a decision, and Jesus cannot make any decision. If they claim that Jesus is already Omniscient, then by the next day, he can walk, talk, and remove the Learning Curve since GOD is Omniscient. That is the problem with their formulation because it only focuses on making Man into a GOD without considering the aspects of being Human, the learning curve, the opposite of the Nature of GOD, Who is always Omniscient.

So tell me, what is lacking in the knowledge of their false GOD that it needs increasing? What is lacking in the wisdom of their false GOD that it needs increasing? Omniscient means All-knowing, not somewhat knowing that needs expanding, not slightly knowing that requires a learning curve. Even their scripture shows that Jesus is not Omniscient and their Dual Nature/Hypostatic Union is there to fill in the gap which still results in fallacy. The notion that Jesus rose from the dead has no bearing because no matter how many times Jesus rose from the dead, you will end up having the graph Figure C. Their Wrong Faith Paradigm creates Impurity on the Omniscience of GOD. It will always end up in a graph showing a State of Impurity regardless of how many times they resurrect Jesus. They will claim that the death of Jesus overcame sin, but it did not overcome the Impurity that it caused on the Nature of GOD, and it will always end up in a graph having impurities on the record of their false GOD. I’m encouraging everyone to think first on the side of GOD, i.e., the Nature of GOD, before thinking of any religion, doctrine, or formulation. Some will argue that is what faith is in your Religion, and ours are different. We cannot use the difference between any religion because we are not at the level of Religion, and the Nature of GOD is above any Religion. The Nature of GOD is that He is Always Omniscient regardless of Religion. Remember that the Nature of GOD existed before the universe or any religion existed.

The core of their doctrine is the Death of Jesus for the Salvation of Man over sin. Death is not the Nature of GOD because True GOD is the First and the Last. Death is the end of something, in this case, the end of life as a human being for Jesus. GOD has no death because GOD has no state where we put an end to something on Him. If we put Death under the Nature of GOD, we are implying that there is something in GOD that will end, and that would imply imperfection or incompleteness. GOD is complete, so having Death in GOD’s Nature does not fit the picture. Death is part of the design of GOD with the life of His creations. Death falls under the Nature of Man because we are GOD’s creation, and GOD is not a creation. So the very core of their equation is Death of Jesus equals Salvation. Along this equation, for their equation to appear like it’s working, they have put the Nature of Man (death) as the solution to salvation, making the Nature of Man as the solution, instead of the Nature of GOD. As shown in Figure A. The Wrong Faith Paradigm, Salvation is top of their paradigm, the Nature of Man comes next to fill in their equation of Salvation, while the Nature of GOD is at the bottom that their doctrine decides when it gets applied according to their formulation, and their false GOD as a medium to materialize salvation at the bottom because Salvation for them is of higher priority that their false GOD is sacrificed for it.

Readers, Parishioners, and Good People, please let us Put GOD and His Nature Above All. We should put the Nature of GOD above all Natures, above any religion, for it is not right that any religion, doctrine, or formulation dictates when the Nature of GOD should prevail. Putting the Nature of Man to dominate over the Nature of GOD is wrong, as reflected in their doctrine of Dual Nature, Hypostatic Union, and Trinity doctrine. GOD can find a way for Salvation where His Nature as GOD dominates above all, and other parishioners ignore this because they think that their religion and doctrine dictate when their false GOD becomes Omniscient, so they put the Nature of Man to dominate over the Nature of GOD where on top of their equation is Salvation. A Salvation that puts the Nature of GOD below their doctrine, formulation, or narrative to create a notion of Sacrifice for Salvation is a fallacy because it presumes that GOD cannot find a way that His Nature as GOD prevails above all, all the time and in all existence. This Roman Catholic doctrine for Salvation is a fallacy because it puts impurities on the Omniscience of GOD, blemishing and tainting the Record of GOD to push their agenda of making Man a GOD. We should have Faith in GOD that He can provide us Salvation where He maintains His Purity In all states and all existence. True Faith is when the Nature of GOD always prevails over all creations. For details, please read the Chapter 3 Omniscience of the free book Save Our Souls.

Do you have Faith in GOD that He can provide us Salvation where His Omniscience has Purity in All States and Existence, and His Nature as GOD is above all?

Related Posts

• The Nature of GOD
• The Right Faith Paradigm
• GOD is Omniscient 1
• GOD is Omniscient 2
• GOD is Omniscient 3
• GOD is Omniscient 4
• Broken Unfathomable Doctrine 1
• Broken Unfathomable Doctrine 2
• Avoidance Strategy 1

References

1. https://ahavahpublisher.com/book/ “Save Our Souls. Fritz Jeran Velasco, 2024”